Expert analysis, research findings, and practical guidance on AI governance, certification, and the evolving landscape of algorithmic accountability.
Functional safety engineering has spent decades building a rigorous language for how much a safety function can be trusted. It is tempting to extend that language to AI components. Some of it transfers well. The part everyone wants most does not transfer at all.
Functional safety engineering has spent decades building a rigorous language for how much a safety function can be trusted. It is tempting to extend that language to AI components. Some of it transfers well. The part everyone wants most does not transfer at all.
AIC's public register currently lists no certified organisations, because none are certified. We could have populated it with examples, pilots or logos. Here is why we did not, and what the design of an empty register commits us to later.
South Africa withdrew its draft National AI Policy because six of its academic references were invented. The instructive part is not that a machine produced them. It is that the document travelled from drafting through internal review, Cabinet approval and publication in the Government Gazette without anyone checking.
Subscribe to receive monthly insights on certification trends, policy updates, and best practices from AIC experts.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. Read our privacy policy.
The Five-Division accountability model, and what an AIC assessment covers.
Read the framework